The world of racing games just got a reality check! iRacing Studios has sparked a debate among NASCAR fans with its latest release, NASCAR 25.
A Shocking Rating for a Racing Legend:
Jimmie Johnson, the seven-time Cup Series champion, has been dealt a surprising blow. With a rating of 54 out of 100, he's ranked as the 8th worst active driver in the game. But here's the twist: this rating system isn't just about speed.
And this is where it gets intriguing. iRacing Studios has taken a unique approach by considering more than just raw talent. They've factored in recent performance and team dynamics, which has led to some unexpected results.
The Method Behind the Ratings:
In NASCAR 25, AI drivers' abilities are scaled to mirror real-life racing outcomes. Unlike traditional racing games, these ratings are not hidden but boldly displayed, following the trend of sports video games like EA's Madden NFL series. But is it fair to judge drivers on more than just their driving skills?
Take William Byron, for instance. Despite lacking a Cup Series championship, he's rated a perfect 100 as the 2025 regular season champion. This raises the question: should current form outweigh historical achievements?
Controversial Ratings Spark Debate:
Jimmie Johnson's rating has fans divided. His recent part-time status and team change might justify a lower rating, but does it truly reflect his legendary driving skills? And what about Brenden Queen's 99 rating in the ARCA series? Is it an accurate representation or a case of over-inflation?
As racing games strive for realism, the line between simulation and opinion becomes blurred. Are these ratings a fair assessment or a controversial twist? You decide. Share your thoughts in the comments below!
